identify points in the peer review cycle that seem especially important and explain why
We are confident that we have the best essaywriters in the market. We have a team of experienced writers who are familiar with all types of essays, and we are always willing to help you with any questions or problems you might face. Plus, our writers are always available online so you can always get the help you need no matter where you are in the world.
Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper
The purpose of this assignment is to learn about information literacy by exploring the concept of peer review. You may be familiar with peer review in prior writing courses, but what does it mean when you talk about peer review in relation to academic source material? Click on the following link to a DeVry University Library presentation of Peer Reviewed Journals: The Creation of New Knowledge. http://library.devry.edu/pdfs/Peer_Review_PPT.pdf (Links to an external site.) The PDF presentation contains 20 slides that will introduce the peer review cycle.
Save your time - order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines
Order Paper NowAfter reviewing the presentation, compose a 2-paragraph response in which you address each of the following points:
- In your own words, identify points in the peer review cycle that seem especially important and explain why.
- How does an editor differ from a peer reviewer? Use at least two points to support your response.
- Based on this information, explain whether your article for this week was peer reviewed? How can you determine this information?
- As you work on your research in this class, where specifically can you look to find peer-reviewed information?
Submit your assignment by the due date.
Rubric
ENGL 147N Week 2 Info Literacy Assignment Rubric (35pts)
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAdequately identifies points in the peer review cycle that seem important and explains why. |
|
5.0 pts |
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAdequately explains how an editor differs from a peer reviewer with at least two points for support. |
|
10.0 pts |
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAdequately explains whether or not the article was peer reviewed and how this was determined. |
|
10.0 pts |
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTimeliness and Deadlines |
|
5.0 pts |
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Writing Quality |
|
5.0 pts |
||||
|
Total Points: 35.0 |
||||||
Do you have a lot of essay writing to do? Do you feel like you’re struggling to find the right way to go about it? If so, then you might want to consider getting help from a professional essay writer. Click one of the buttons below.
Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper
