We are confident that we have the best essaywriters in the market. We have a team of experienced writers who are familiar with all types of essays, and we are always willing to help you with any questions or problems you might face. Plus, our writers are always available online so you can always get the help you need no matter where you are in the world.
Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper
Teacher’s updated command:
Save your time - order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlinesOrder Paper Now
Hi Dandan: Moving forward, you will need to re-read my example in the assignment instructions and work towards refining ALL of your annotations. Please use single-spacing and you will need to use PAGE #’s as paragraphs aren’t clear.
How to Write Annotations
100 of the 400 points possible is connected to the Personal Political Philosophy (PPP) assignment. 75 of the 100 points possible are linked to your creation of three separate annotations for three ACADEMIC JOURNAL articles. For examples, the supplementary readings for each module are academic journal articles. Whereas the topics focus on the module theme, you will search for articles on your own.
Once you have completed the preliminary steps for the PPP assignment, the hard work begins. When I say “shop” for articles, you must search for articles you find interesting. If you don’t like the article, then do not use it! Hopefully, you have read HOW TO READ A RESEARCH ARTICLE and have practiced the steps provided for our supplementary reading. This is essential for writing an annotation because it forms the basis of your ANALYSIS (comprehension) of the ideas in the articles you selected.
So, to write an annotation:
- Begin by reading the article according to the steps in HOW TO READ A RESEARCH ARTICLE.
- Re-read the article for the MAIN argument and the SUPPORTING ideas.
- Explain the MEANING of the main argument and the supporting ideas by THOROUGHLY working through the article.
- In your annotation, be sure to provide page numbers along the way (see attached example).
- Follow the formatting in the example. You are technically building a bibliography, but it is annotated, and like all bibliographies, yours should begin on a new page and at the top. List sources alphabetically and use the hanging indent (easier than it looks–google will tell you).
- Do this for three articles (keepers) to establish a grounded exploration of historical political philosophy to nuance yours
For example, take the Colin Kaepernick and now, larger NFL workplace-protest controversy. This is evidence of personal political philosophies, or the deep-seeded reactions you have to situations. These reactions are often emotional–as politics ideals with everything you care about–yet they are LEARNED behaviors. Are you reacting or listening?
To truly know where you stand is to first identify the political philosophy you mostly likely learned from parents and/or other family. More recently, you may have gravitated towards “friends” who share learned reactions. Then the discomfort of it all: when there is nuance in what it means to be “progressive,” or “conservative.” Most individuals believe they are unique and therefore so are their political inclinations, but with just a few broad terms, how can this be so? This is a classical philosophical question that is answered in pursuing an investigation of yourself through the literature of political science THEORY. No one theory describes you any better than a political party affiliation, although there is much more specificity.
I’ll use myself as an example. My household was “democrat” and yet the city of Pittsburgh is hardly a liberal bastion like Seattle. Even though I wasn’t Catholic, I attended a high school that was and most students were uninterested in politics. At university, many consider themselves “liberal” but then stop asking WHY there is so much nuance with diversity. It is challenging to be this open-minded to your own assumptions. But I pressed forward with a variety of coursework in the social sciences. When I first started teaching in Seattle, I was forced to address the more conservative elements of my “liberal” identity. As I developed this assignment, I again used myself as a model, and I uncovered that I’m radical. That freaked me out; I don’t advocate violence to achieve political outcomes, but there is such a strong association with violence and radical politics. To sort this out, my literature review brought me to “contemporary intellectual radicalism.” From there, the literature became a part of my life-long evolution of how I view myself politically. This process is a snapshot in time, so what you are now can change and probably will.
So, how do you do this?
- Even if you think you already know where you stand, please take this quiz (Links to an external site.).
- Then locate your “label” corresponding to your quiz outcome on this image (Links to an external site.). This is our agreed upon starting point for the course. To ignore this and attempt the rest of the assignment usually wastes time and so just do this!
- Go to our research library databases (EBSCOHost and JStor are best) and SHOP for articles that touch on the philosophy in some way. In most cases, the originating political philosophy is recapped so the researcher can show you what is being added, or taken away, modified, etc.
- Collect 3 – 5 articles that you find interesting, and are appropriate for your reading level.
- Annotate them. (How to Annotate is in MODULE 0)
- Once you have accurately, and fully annotated your articles, you may proceed to the last part of the assignment.
- Write a 1-2 page summary of your findings from the articles and how they relate to your personal political philosophy.
Some important things to note:
- This is a QUARTER long assignment. Some of you will have an easier time than others, and so the only way to know where you are is to get started ASAP and begin the revision process with me.
- You will turn in multiple drafts throughout the quarter so that you can continue to refine (and improve your score).
- When you get stuck–and many of you will–please do not wait to contact me!
This is about and for you. I cannot tell you who you are, but I can ask that you clarify using the language of our discipline. Therefore, it is without question that you must use academic journals to do this assignment. Occasionally, students find access to particular journals that are not in EBSCO or JStor, and while this is fine–YOU MUST CHECK WITH ME BEFORE USING IT. Otherwise, you could waste a lot of time working on something I will not accept.